PHP to Laravel Migration Services

PHP 5.x/7.x to Laravel migration: real costs ($25K–$1M+), 85% success with the incremental Strangler Fig approach. 10 vetted firms.

Updated ·30 verified projects·Peter Korpak·Methodology

Key findings

85%Success rateacross 30 projects
$150kMedian cost
9 monthsMedian timeline

Risk of inactionProcedural PHP applications accumulate security vulnerabilities faster than MVC applications. Raw SQL and manual session management are targets for injection attacks. Without a framework, each developer adds ad-hoc patterns that diverge and become unmaintainable.

The Challenge: "It Works, But We're Scared to Touch It"

Your legacy PHP application (likely built on CodeIgniter, CakePHP, Symfony 1.x, or a Custom MVC) is the backbone of your business. But it's brittle. Developers are afraid to deploy. Security patches for PHP 5.6 or 7.x are long gone.

Migrating to Laravel is the industry standard for modernizing PHP. It offers a robust ecosystem, strict security defaults, and a developer experience that helps you hire top talent. But getting there without breaking the business is the hard part.

Technical Deep Dive

1. The "Strangler Fig" Pattern

The only safe way to migrate a live application is incrementally. We use the Strangler Fig Pattern:

  1. Install Laravel alongside your legacy app.
  2. Configure Nginx/Apache to route specific URLs to Laravel, while defaulting everything else to the legacy app.
  3. Migrate one module (e.g., User Profile) to Laravel.
  4. Switch the route to point to Laravel.
  5. Repeat until the legacy app is gone.

2. The Session Problem

The biggest technical hurdle is sharing state. When a user logs into the Legacy app, they must be logged into Laravel, and vice versa.

  • Solution: Use a shared session store (Redis or Database).
  • Implementation: Write a custom Laravel Session Driver (implementing Illuminate\Contracts\Session\Session) that reads the legacy session format, or update the legacy app to write Laravel-compatible sessions.

3. Database Coexistence

You cannot simply "change the database" overnight.

  • Strategy: Both applications connect to the same database.
  • Eloquent Models: Create Laravel Eloquent models that map to your existing legacy tables. You do not need to rename tables immediately.
    class User extends Model {
        protected $table = 'tbl_usr_01'; // Map to legacy table
        protected $primaryKey = 'id_usr';
    }
    
  • Refactoring: Rename columns and restructure tables after the code migration is complete, using Laravel Migrations.

Architecture Transformation

Architecture TransformationArchitecture Transformation

How to Choose a PHP to Laravel Migration Partner

If you need to reskill your team: Vehikl. Their "Mob Programming" approach means they code with your team, teaching them TDD and Laravel best practices as they migrate. You end up with a modernized app AND a modernized team.

If you have a complex, high-traffic domain: Spatie. They are the architects of the modern Laravel ecosystem. If your domain logic is knotty and performance is critical, they are the best in the world.

If you need enterprise-grade consulting: Tighten. They specialize in working with large organizations and navigating the organizational challenges of migration, not just the code.

If you are budget-conscious: Belitsoft or 10Clouds. They offer high-quality engineering talent at competitive rates, ideal for labor-intensive refactoring work.

Red flags:

  • "We'll rewrite it in 3 months." (They won't. It will take 12, and it will be buggy.)
  • "We don't write tests." (Migration is refactoring. Refactoring without tests is suicide.)
  • "We'll use an automated converter tool for everything." (Tools like Laravel Shift are great helpers, but they don't fix architectural rot. Human insight is required.)

When to Hire PHP Migration Services

1. Security Compliance Failure (SOC2 / ISO 27001)

Your penetration test failed because you're running PHP 5.6 or 7.0. You cannot upgrade PHP because the legacy framework doesn't support PHP 8.x. Trigger: "We failed our SOC2 audit due to EOL software."

2. Feature Paralysis (Velocity Collapse)

Adding a simple feature takes weeks because the code is "spaghetti." New developers take months to onboard because there is no documentation and "magic" global variables everywhere. Trigger: "It took 3 weeks to change a button color."

3. Talent Drain

Good developers don't want to work on CodeIgniter 2 in 2025. They want to work with Laravel, Vue, and React. You are losing your best people to companies with modern stacks. Trigger: "Our lead dev just quit."


Total Cost of Ownership: Legacy vs. Laravel

Line ItemLegacy PHP (Annual)Modern Laravel (Annual)
HostingHigh (Inefficient code, vertical scaling)Low (Horizontal scaling, Serverless)
Maintenance$150k (Bug fixes take forever)$50k (Clean code, automated tests)
New FeaturesSlow (High risk of breaking things)Fast (CI/CD, confident deployment)
Security RiskCritical (Unpatched vulnerabilities)Low (Auto-updates, secure defaults)

Break-Even Analysis:

  • Migration Cost: $150k (One-time)
  • Annual Savings: $100k
  • Break-Even: 1.5 Years

Typical Migration Roadmap

Phase 1: Preparation (Weeks 1-4)

  • Dockerize the legacy application (ensure consistent environment).
  • Add Tests to the most critical paths (Login, Checkout) using Cypress or Playwright.
  • Install Laravel and configure the web server (Strangler Fig setup).

Phase 2: The "Walking Skeleton" (Weeks 5-8)

  • Implement Shared Authentication (Users can log in to both apps).
  • Migrate the Layout/Shell (Header, Footer, Navigation) so users don't see a visual jar between apps.

Phase 3: Incremental Migration (Months 3-12)

  • Pick a module (e.g., "Invoices").
  • Write Feature Tests in Laravel.
  • Implement the logic in Laravel (refactoring as you go).
  • Switch the route.
  • Delete the legacy code for that module.

Phase 4: Cleanup (Month 13)

  • Remove the legacy app files.
  • Refactor the database schema (rename tables/columns).
  • Celebrate!

CodeIgniter to Laravel Migration

CodeIgniter 2/3 applications are strong candidates for incremental Laravel migration because they already use MVC patterns. The practical path is to keep the existing database, run Laravel and CodeIgniter side-by-side, and migrate module-by-module with route-level cutovers. This avoids a full rewrite and lets teams ship features during modernization.

PHP 5 to Laravel Upgrade Cost

For legacy PHP 5.x estates, cost depends on architecture quality and test coverage more than framework choice. In our current benchmark set, projects range from $25K to $1M+, with a $150K median. Smaller migrations typically involve a critical module carve-out; enterprise programs include auth/session unification, database coexistence, and phased domain refactoring.

How Much Does PHP to Laravel Migration Cost?

Most organizations should budget for a staged engagement rather than a single "big bang" estimate. Typical windows are 6-18 months and the strongest outcomes come from incremental migration plans that preserve uptime. The lowest-risk pricing model is phased delivery: discovery and risk burn-down first, then module waves with production validation after each cutover.


FAQ

Why not just rewrite in Node.js or Go?

PHP is alive and well. Laravel is faster to develop in than almost anything else. If your team knows PHP, moving to Laravel leverages their existing skills while giving you modern power. Rewriting in a new language throws away all your domain knowledge and requires a completely new hiring strategy.

Can we use automated tools like Laravel Shift?

Yes! We love Laravel Shift for upgrading existing Laravel apps. For legacy PHP code, we use Rector. Rector is an automated refactoring tool that can instantly upgrade old PHP syntax (e.g., array() to [], adding type hints) to modern standards. However, moving from a custom legacy framework to Laravel requires human architectural decisions that tools can't make.

What happens to our data?

Your data stays right where it is. We connect Laravel to your existing database. We might add some new tables for Laravel features (like migrations, jobs, sessions), but your core business data remains untouched until we explicitly decide to refactor the schema.


Risk Factors

The 'Big Bang' Rewrite Trap

Attempting to rewrite the entire application from scratch usually leads to multi-year delays and feature freeze. The 'Strangler Fig' pattern is the only safe approach.

Session State Incompatibility

Sharing user sessions between the legacy app and the new Laravel app is critical for incremental migration but technically challenging (requires custom session drivers).

Routing Conflicts

Managing two routers (Legacy + Laravel) simultaneously requires precise web server configuration (Nginx/Apache) to delegate requests correctly.


Feasibility Analysis

Ideal candidates

  • CodeIgniter 2/3 or CakePHP 2 apps
  • Custom PHP 5.x apps with security vulnerabilities
  • Teams that want to adopt modern PHP practices

Break-even cost: $100k/year in maintenance savings Talent risk: Low. Laravel developers are abundant, but legacy knowledge is fading.

The numbers

Verified benchmarks for PHP to Laravel Migration Services, aggregated from analyzed projects. Figures are ranges, not point estimates.

Cost

$25k$1M+median $150k
PHP to Laravel Migration Services cost range. Cost range: $25k to $1M+, median $150k.

Timeline

036mo9 months
PHP to Laravel Migration Services timeline. Timeline: 9 months.

Success rate

658085%
PHP to Laravel Migration Services success rate. Success rate: 85% across 30 analyzed projects.

Vendor pool

Boutique3Mid-size5Enterprise2
PHP to Laravel Migration Services vendors by team size. Vendor pool by team size (10 total): 3 Boutique, 5 Mid-size, 2 Enterprise.
PHP to Laravel Migration Services verified benchmark figures
Cost range$25k – $1M+
Median cost$150k
Median timeline9 months
Success rate85%
ComplexityLow
Typical ROI3–9 months
Projects analyzedn=30

The business case

Typical ROI

3–9 months

Key drivers

  • Laravel Eloquent ORM eliminates manual SQL and reduces SQL injection surface
  • Built-in authentication, queues, and scheduling replaces custom-built equivalents
  • Composer dependency management replaces ad-hoc file includes
  • Larger talent market — Laravel is the most-adopted PHP framework

Should you migrate?

A decision framework for PHP to Laravel Migration Services — the conditions that favor migrating, the ones that argue against it, and the alternatives worth weighing first.

Migrate if

  • Application runs procedural PHP 5.x/7.x with no MVC framework
  • Security vulnerabilities from raw PHP SQL queries and missing input validation
  • Need to add authentication, queues, or modern API features efficiently
  • Team wants to adopt modern PHP ecosystem (Composer, PHPUnit, Horizon)

Don't migrate if

  • Application is running on PHP 8.x already with a modern framework (Symfony, etc.)
  • Team is planning to rewrite in a non-PHP language within 12 months

Alternatives to consider

Alternatives to PHP to Laravel Migration Services
AlternativeWhyBest for
SymfonyEnterprise-grade PHP framework — more opinionated and enterprise-feature-rich than LaravelLarge applications needing strict architecture and enterprise PHP patterns
PHP → Node.jsSwitch languages if team wants JavaScript full-stackTeams moving toward unified JS/TS stack for front and back end

Recommended Partners

Spatie logo
Spatie

Domain-Driven Design & Packages

Best for: Complex domain logic and high-quality codebases

50 case studiesBoutiqueBelgium
Tighten logo
Tighten

Enterprise Consulting

Best for: Large-scale refactoring and team training

35 case studiesBoutiqueUSA
Vehikl logo
Vehikl

Mob Programming & TDD

Best for: Reskilling your internal team while migrating

40 case studiesMidSizeCanada
Kirschbaum logo
Kirschbaum

Staff Augmentation

Best for: US-based teams needing immediate expert help

45 case studiesMidSizeUSA
Beyond Code logo
Beyond Code

Developer Tooling

Best for: Projects requiring custom migration tooling

20 case studiesBoutiqueGermany
10Clouds logo
10Clouds

Fintech & Banking

Best for: Compliance-heavy applications

60 case studiesMidSizePoland
Scalo logo
Scalo

Team Scaling

Best for: Rapidly scaling development capacity

42 case studiesMidSizePoland (Global)
Iflexion logo
Iflexion

Complex Integrations

Best for: Enterprise apps with many 3rd party integrations

150 case studiesEnterpriseUSA
ScienceSoft logo
ScienceSoft

Healthcare & HIPAA

Best for: Healthcare applications requiring strict compliance

90 case studiesMidSizeUSA / Europe
Belitsoft logo
Belitsoft

Cost-Effective Outsourcing

Best for: Budget-conscious migrations

100 case studiesEnterprisePoland

Related Migrations

Frequently Asked Questions

Why migrate to Laravel instead of just upgrading PHP?

Upgrading PHP versions keeps you secure, but doesn't fix architectural debt. Laravel provides a modern ecosystem (Queues, Jobs, Events, Testing) that accelerates future development.

Can we migrate without rewriting everything?

Yes. Using the Strangler Fig pattern, we can run Laravel alongside your legacy app, migrating one route at a time. This allows you to ship features during the migration.

How long does a typical migration take?

It varies by complexity, but a typical incremental migration takes 6-12 months. The benefit is that the application remains functional and improved throughout the process.

Peter Korpak

Chief Analyst, Software Modernization Intelligence · 10+ years B2B market research

Last reviewed:

30 projects analyzed